Pendampingan Guru Melalui Capacity Building dalam Rangka Optimalisasi Implementasi Penilaian Otentik Kurikulum 2013 (K-13) di MINU Curungrejo Kepanjen Malang
Main Article Content
Kurikulum 2013’s is actually a government program that has been rolled out since then. However, in practice, there are still many teachers who have difficulties to implement it, especially in the case of the implementation of authentic assessments. This was experienced by the teachers of MINU Curungrejo Kepanjen Malang Regency. On this basis, the program focused on helping a teacher to improve understanding of Curriculum 2013 implementation (K-13) that relates to assessment. Various assessments must be carried out, namely; optical assessment, assessment of learning outcomes, Assessment of mastery learning, class assessment, and attitude assessment. The community service method in this activity uses two phases; the School Action Research and the Outcome Mapping. The results of the activities were carried out for six weeks starting from August to September 2018. They showed that intensive training and mentoring through School Action Research (SAR) and Outcome Mapping (OM) can improve the ability of teachers to implement the 2013 curriculum.
Alimuddin. “Penilaian Dalam Kurikulum 2013.” Vol. 1, 2014. https://journal.uncp.ac.id/index.php/proceding/article/view/220/209.
Cheong Cheng, Yin. “Effectiveness of Curriculum Change in School: An Organizational Perspective.” International Journal of Educational Management 8, no. 3 (June 1, 1994): 26–34.
Defrez, Steff. Outcome Mapping: Jejak Perubahan Menuju Keberhasilan. Denpasar: PT. Cintya, 2010.
Enco, Mulyasa. Menjadi Guru Profesional. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2003.
Halimah, Siti. “Analisis Pemahaman Dan Kesiapan Guru Mengimplementasikan Kurikulum 2013” (2015).
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. Panduan Teknik Penilaian Di Sekolah Dasar. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 2013.
Kurniasih, Imas, and Berlin Sani. Revisi Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Kata Pena, 2016.
Lucas, Margarida, and Isabel Cabrita. “The Implications of Curriculum Change: Perceptions of East Timorese Policymakers.” The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher 25, no. 5 (December 1, 2016): 807–815.
Melati, Ema Rahma, and Yuli Utanto. “Kendala Guru Sekolah Dasar Dalam Memahami Kurikulum 2013.” Indonesian Journal of Curriculum and Educational Technology Studies 4, no. 1 (2016): 1–9.
Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 6 Tahun 2018 Tentang Penugasan Guru Sebagai Kepala Sekolah, Bab VII Pengembangan Keprofesian Berkelanjutan Kepala Sekolah. Jakarta, 2018. http://lppks.kemdikbud.go.id /uploads/pengumuman/1526355089Permendikbud_Nomor6_Tahun2018.pdf.
Menteri Pendidikan Nasional RI. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 13 Tahun 2007 Tentang Standar Kepala Sekolah/Madrasah. Jakarta, 2007. http://pmp.dikdasmen.kemdikbud.go.id /files/peraturan/permen/Permen_No_13_Tentang_Standar_Kepala_Sekolah.pdf.
Setiadi, Hari. “Pelaksanaan Penilaian Pada Kurikulum 2013.” Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan 20, no. 2 (2016): 166–178.
Soesatyo, Yoyok. “Pelatihan Penulisan Proposal Penelitian Tindakan Kelas (PTK) Bagi Guru Ekonomi Kabupaten Sidoarjo | Jurnal Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Madani (JPMM)” 1, no. 2 (2017): 162–178.
Wuryani, Wuri, and Muhhammad Irham. “Penilaian Dalam Perspektif Kurikulum 2013” 19, no. 1 (2009): 181–199.
Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 19 Tahun 2005 Tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan. Jakarta, 2005.