Main Article Content
The Act of Village has given many opportunities for villages in Indonesia to generate innovation in the local contexts. The governance for village development creates a new way to develop the rural area through visionary leadership innovation. This study showcases two villages that can encourage modernism in innovative leadership, namely Panggungharjo Village and Sayan Village. These villages have been able to promote local democratization from political clientelism to good governance. This study presented social change by the Most Significant Change (MOS) approach that involves two headmen in the site of engagement community. The critical finding of this study is directed into three notions. First, a contestation of village election is free from clientelistic and money politics. Second, the program is oriented toward citizenship. Third, the governing authority in the local village is given by the resources in the form of village funds allocated in a targeted and legal manner to support community empowerment. In this community service, community organizing to realize good governance practices through innovative leadership is a central issue in the sustainable development of the village
Astuti, Eka Zuni Lusi. “Gerakan Literasi Digital: Studi Pemberdayaan Pemuda Melalui Program Sistem Informasi Potensi Kreatif Desa di Kulonprogo.” Jurnal Pemberdayaan Masyarakat: Media Pemikiran dan Dakwah Pembangunan 3, no. 2 (2019): 331–352.
Bayo, Longgina Novadona, and Purwo Santoso. “Breaking the Chains of Transactionalism: A Village Election without Money Politics in Panggungharjo.” PCD Journal 7, no. 2 (2019): 283–315.
Bayo, Longgina Novadona, Santoso, and Purwo. “Breaking the Chains of Transactionalism : A Village Election without Money Politics in Panggungharjo” VII, no. 2 (2019): 283–315.
Berenschot, Ward. “The Political Economy of Clientelism: A Comparative Study of Indonesia’s Patronage Democracy.” Comparative Political Studies 51, no. 12 (2018): 1563–1593.
Dart, Jessica, and Rick Davies. “A Dialogical, Story-Based Evaluation Tool: The Most Significant Change Technique.” American Journal of Evaluation 24, no. 2 (2003): 137–155.
Davies, Rick, and Jess Dart. The “Most Significant Change” (MSC)Technique: A Guide to Its Use. Knowledge Solutions. United Kingdom, 2005.
Dewi, Dita. “Economic Develompment Strategy Through Rural Areas A Case Study in Toba Samosir, North Sumatera, Indonesia.” Journal of Indonesian Applied Economics 8, no. 2 (2020): 27–34.
Eko, Sutoro. Desa Membangun Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Australian Aid & FPPD, 2014.
Fink Shapiro, Lilly, Lesli Hoey, and Kathryn Colasanti. “Stories as Indicators: Lessons Learned Using the Most Significant Change Method to Evaluate Food Systems Work in Michigan.” Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development 10, no. 2 (2021): 399–411.
Hadi, Wahyudi Anggoro. Jangan Tinggalkan Desa. Yogyakarta: Elfira Publishing, 2018.
Handayani, Anik Puji, and Rudy Badrudin. “Evaluation of Village Fund Allocation on Indonesia.” Journal of Accounting and Investment 20, no. 3 (2019): 283–295.
Hudayana, Bambang, Pande Made Kutanegara, Setiadi Setiadi, Agus Indiyanto, Zamzam Fauzanafi, Mubarika Dyah F. Nugraheni, Wiwik Sushartami, and Mohamad Yusuf. “Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) Untuk Pengembangan Desa Wisata Di Pedukuhan Pucung, Desa Wukirsari, Bantul.” Bakti Budaya 2, no. 2 (2019): 99–112.
Hutahaean, Marlan. “Policy of Development from Outskirts: Analysis of Budgeting for Village Funds in Indonesia” VIII, no. 4 (2020): 197–203.
Izudin, Ahmad. “Backflow to Rural Social Identity: The Case of Ecotourism Potency to Protect Sangrawayang Villagers Asset in Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmiah Syi’ar 21, no. 2 (2021): 116–137.
Johannessen, Jon Arild, and Hugo Skaalsvik. “Innovative Leadership in Organizations: The Road to Innovation Performance.” Problems and Perspectives in Management 12, no. 2 (2014): 139–152.
Kusumastuti, Ayu. “Modal Sosial Dan Mekanisme Adaptasi Masyarakat Pedesaan Dalam Pengelolaan Dan Pembangunan Infrastruktur.” MASYARAKAT: Jurnal Sosiologi 20, no. 1 (2016): 81–97.
Lawson, Chappell, and Kenneth F. Greene. “Making Clientelism Work: How Norms of Reciprocity Increase Voter Compliance.” Comparative Politics 47, no. 1 (2014): 61–77.
Lumbantoruan, D L, and S Mulyani. “Planning and Budgeting: The Study of Village Financing Process In Balige Subdistrict.” Journal of Accounting Auditing … 2, no. 2 (2019): 46–53.
Madjid, Taufik, Rosyidah Rachmawaty, Moch Fachri, Ivanovich Agusta, Hariyanti, Sukoyo, Mustakim, Ramadhani Dwiatmodjo, Winda Oktapisty, and Kholifatul Azizah. Status Indeks Desa Membangun Provinsi, Kabupaten, Kecamatan Tahun 2019. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pembangunan dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Desa Kementerian Desa, PDT dan Transmigrasi, 2019.
Mathie, Alison, and Gord Cunningham. “From Clients to Citizens: Asset-Based Community Development as a Strategy for Community-Driven Development.” Development in Practice 13, no. 5 (2003): 474–486.
Meyer, David S., and Debra C. Minkoff. “Conceptualizing Political Opportunity.” Social Forces 82, no. 4 (2004): 1457–1492.
Moswete, Naomi, Masego A. Mpotokwane, Kenosi Nkape, and Kgosikemotse Maera. “Exploring the Potential and Challenges: Guesthouse Based Tourism and Hospitality in Maun, Botswana.” African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure 8, no. 4 (2019): 1–19.
Mutiono, Mutiono. “Developing of Integrative Ecotourism in Waifoi Village, Papua Barat, Indonesia.” Jurnal Pemberdayaan Masyarakat: Media Pemikiran dan Dakwah Pembangunan 4, no. 2 (2020): 345–366.
Ramly, Ar Royyan, Wahyuddin, Julli Mursida, and Mawardi. “The Implementation of Village Fund Policy in Improving Economy of Village Society (Case Study at Kuala Sub-District of Nagan Raya District).” Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun 6, no. 3 (2018): 459–478.
Rozaki, Abdur. Dari Representasi Simbolik Menuju Representasi Substantif. Yogyakarta: IRE, 2014.
———. Islam, Oligarki Politik, Dan Perlawanan Sosial. Yogyakarta: IRCiSoD, 2021.
Roziqin, Ali, and Zharfa Syarafina. “Tourism Village Development Study: Lesson Learned from Flory Village, Sleman Regency, Yogyakarta.” Masyarakat, Kebudayaan dan Politik 34, no. 2 (2021): 173–183.
Saputra, I Gede Gian. “Bentuk Digitalisasi Desa Wisata Di Masa Normal Baru.” Jurnal Kepariwisataan 20, no. 1 (2021): 18–24.
Sashkin, Marshall. “A New Vision of Leadership.” Journal of Management Development 6, no. 4 (1987): 19–28.
Sidik, Fajar. “Menggali Potensi Lokal Mewujudkan Kemandirian Desa.” JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) 19, no. 2 (2015): 115–131.
Simanihuruk, M., and T. Sihombing. “Fiscal Decentralization in Villages: High Nepotism Low Capacity.” In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. Vol. 374, 2019.
Suryawati, Nany. “Dynamics of Village Governance Based on Law Number 6 Year 2014 Concerning Village Communities.” Annals of the Romanian Society for Cell Biology 25, no. 3 (2021): 8324–8332.
Syafingi, H M, D A S Dewi, Suharso, Heniyatun, P Sulistyaningsih, and U Rahmawati. “Village Fund Optimization Strategy for Rural Community Welfare in Indonesia.” Journal of Critical Reviews 7, no. 7 (2020): 580–583.
Zamroni, Sunaji, M. Zainal Anwar, Sugeng Yulianto, Abdur Rozaki, and Ashari Cahyo Edi. Desa Mengembangkan Penghidupan Berkelanjutan. Yogyakarta: IRE Yogyakarta, 2015.